In 6 weeks you build an AI agent that reads your own emails and call recordings and proves each revenue figure back to the deal it came from. No code. No new software. You own it outright.
One team's weekly SDR call review, now across 30x the calls.
Lila has carried the number and answered for the forecast.
Live on the call, on your data, every week. Not a recording.
Nothing to install, nothing for IT or procurement to sign off.
"I ask how we got to that number and I get a story, not a source."
"My team runs hundreds of calls a month. I listen to a handful."
"We logged it as lost on price. It never reached anyone who could say yes."
"We pay for 3 tools that all give a different answer, and none of them show me why."
Ask AI if it is sure, and it just sounds more sure. So the agent you build doesn't get to decide. It finds and quotes what was said; your code does the sums and gives the verdict.
The transcript
AI on its own says
"They can sign."
Ask a second AI and it says the opposite. One quotes 04:12, the other 08:47. Both are defensible, so which one goes in your forecast?
Your agent says
"No economic buyer on this deal."
Both quotes, both timestamps, and the deal flagged until the person who signs off the money is in the room.
Sourcing
Every answer is matched back to the call, document or record it came from, and you can open it.
Method
AI only finds and quotes. Your code does the arithmetic, so a figure never gets invented on the way to you.
Honesty
Anything it cannot evidence comes back flagged, not dressed up as fact.
Each Wednesday we take one thing you check by hand and turn it into evidence the agent produces on its own. You learn the pattern once, then point it at any source you add later.
It reads your call recordings and email threads and flags the deals where nobody in the room can say yes to the money. No recordings? Emails alone are enough to start.
You leave with: a live economic-buyer check on your own pipeline.
The losses logged as price that were nothing of the kind, surfaced without you opening a single record.
You leave with: a list of "lost" deals worth reopening.
Every figure recalculated by code from your own exports, never typed by AI. Open any one and show where it came from.
You leave with: a board pack where every number opens to its source.
Every "shall / must / required" in an RFP checked against what you can deliver, so you know in minutes if a deal's worth chasing, not days later.
You leave with: an RFP go / no-go check with page references.
Your own knowledge base over every source you have loaded. Cited answers only, and it refuses what the evidence won't support.
You leave with: a searchable, cited memory of your revenue operation.
Daily or weekly, your call. It only comes back to you when something doesn't hold up.
You leave with: a scheduled agent that reports exceptions, not everything.
It's 1 agent and you decide what it checks. Build the full set, or only the pipeline audit. Pick and mix.
You are not following a recorded course. Both trainers are on the call, answering your questions as you build.
17 years as a revenue leader
She has carried the number, run the pipeline reviews and answered for the forecast, managing teams from early-stage start-ups to £1bn+ revenue companies. She built this course because it's exactly what she needed herself.
20+ years in automation · 10+ years with ML/AI
Two decades building automation, and the last ten building with machine learning and AI for enterprise clients. You're taught to build to the standard they demand: it has to prove itself, every time.
No software to set up and nothing for IT to approve. It runs on your own systems and your own data. Joining details land as soon as you book.
Everyone builds together, step by step, on their own calls and records. You leave with something running, not notes.
In software, in hours and in deals. Here's what changes.
The software
£20,000–£50,000
A year, the going rate for revenue intelligence platforms that still can't show you their working. You build this once instead.
The hours
10 hours → 2
One team hand-graded a handful of SDR calls a week. Now the agent grades every call and writes each rep's weekly review, across 30x the calls.
The missed revenue
One deal covers the fee
"Lost on price" often means it never reached the person who signs. Find one of those in week 2 and it covers the whole Accelerator.
One payment, no licence per head. Build it once and every team that needs the truth can use it.
Build it with us and own it
£3,575
+VAT · one payment
Secure checkout via Stripe. VAT invoice issued.
Your build reviewed before you rely on it
£5,225
+VAT · one payment
Secure checkout via Stripe. VAT invoice issued.
We build it on your data and hand it over working
£25,000
+VAT · scoped to your engagement
30-minute scoping call, no obligation.
The check isn't a guess. It either lights up red or it doesn't, so the guarantee doesn't need small print.
This isn't a button that connects your 11 systems and reads your mind. You build it one source at a time: calls, then your CRM, then your reports, and you build the check that proves each one before you trust it. Breadth you can trust beats breadth you were sold.
It doesn't predict your future. It tells you the truth about what your data already says, and shows its work.
It isn't zero effort. 4 hours a week for 6 weeks, and you do the building. If that's not realistic, Done-for-You exists for exactly that reason.
You are, if you own a revenue number and you want to stop taking it on trust. It works whether you run a CRM or a spreadsheet, and whether or not you have built anything before. It's not for you if you want a pack of prompts to copy and paste, or if you'd rather keep paying a monthly fee than own the thing.
Your data stays in your own systems and your own LLM account. Nothing is uploaded to us, and we never see your emails, calls or CRM. You choose the LLM (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or one your company already approves) and it runs under your company's existing terms with that provider. confirm wording
No. If you can use Claude or ChatGPT, you can build every part of this. The AI writes the check for you. You read it, you don't write it.
Data you want to trust. For week 1 that means your emails and, if you have them, your call recordings. Either on its own is enough. A CRM export, a spreadsheet, reports or documents work just as well. You add sources as you go.
For most teams, no. There is nothing to install, nothing to connect and no new vendor. Any LLM and a browser is the whole setup, so there is usually nothing for IT or procurement to sign off.
Every Live Build is recorded and posted to the community space the same day, and the Friday drop-in is there to catch you up.
No. It runs on the tools you already own. You build it, you keep it, and there is no per-seat fee and nothing to rip out later.
Most teach you to build agents. This teaches you to build one you can prove is telling the truth. For a number that goes to your board, auditable beats impressive.
No. It's 1 agent and you decide what it checks. Some people build the full set, some only want the pipeline audit.
6 weeks from now, your team presents the figure, the source behind it and the check that confirmed it. Built by you, owned by your business, running on what you already pay for.